MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2735354657 · doi:10.1161/str.44.suppl_1.atp441

Abstract TP441: Neurovascular Coupling is Impaired in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy

2013· article· en· W2735354657 on OpenAlexaff
Stefano Peca, Cheryl R. McCreary, Emily Donaldson, Karla Sanchez, Anna Charlton, Neelan Pillay, Marc J. Poulin, Richard Frayne, Brad Goodyear, Eric E. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCerebral amyloid angiopathyOccipital lobeNeurovascular bundleParesisVisual acuityVisual cortexCardiologyAudiologyInternal medicinePathologyOphthalmologyNeuroscienceSurgeryPsychologyRadiologyDementia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is marked by accumulation of vascular beta-amyloid which is toxic to smooth muscle cells. An animal study and a pilot study in humans suggest decreased vasodilation in CAA. We studied patients with CAA and matched controls to determine whether neurovascular coupling is impaired in CAA. Methods: Patients with CAA and controls underwent task-related fMRI with a visual task (viewing a flashing alternating checkerboard pattern) or a motor task (tapping the fingers of the dominant hand) using a block design, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). CAA patients were diagnosed by Boston criteria and had normal corrected visual acuity, no visual field deficits and no paresis of the dominant arm. Controls were recruited by community advertising and were matched by gender and age (±5 years) to CAA cases. Results: Eighteen CAA patients (12 M, 6F; 72±7 yrs) and eighteen controls (12 M, 6F; 70±7 yrs) were studied. For the visual task, CAA patients had reduced activity in the occipital lobe (Figure) and lower amplitude of the BOLD response vs. controls (28% reduced, p=0.005). By contrast, for the motor task CAA patients had a similar response of the primary motor cortex vs. controls (9.6% reduced BOLD response, p=0.53). VEP P100 latencies and amplitudes did not differ between CAA and controls (p=0.49 and p=0.74). Lower visual cortex BOLD amplitudes were correlated with greater white matter lesion volumes in CAA (r=-0.66, p=0.003). Conclusions: Neurovascular coupling is impaired in the occipital lobe in CAA. BOLD signal amplitudes are reduced despite normal evoked potentials, suggesting impaired vasodilation. The association with white matter lesion volume raises the possibility that impaired vasodilation may be involved in the pathogenesis of these lesions. BOLD responses in the primary motor cortex in CAA were not reduced, likely reflecting the known posterior predominance of CAA with lesser involvement of the frontal lobe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases→French-language works237,207→