Abriendo caminos poéticos: de Boscán y Garcilaso en sus Obras (1543) a Wordsworth y Coleridge en las Lyrical Ballads (1798)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El objetivo de este artículo es analizar comparativamente dos textosincluidos en sendas obras poéticas de enorme transcendencia en susrespectivos ámbitos literarios: por un lado la “Carta a la Duquesa de Soma”,donde Boscán presenta la nueva poesía renacentista que quiere abrirse pasoen la España del siglo XVI, texto que puede leerse en las Obras (Barcelona,1543) que reúnen poemas del propio Boscán y de Garcilaso de la Vega; porotro, el “Advertisement” o “Advertencia” que Wordsworth sitúa al frente delas Lyrical Ballads (Bristol y Londres, 1798), con poemas de Wordsworth yColeridge, y que constituye el primer hito del Romanticismo en lenguainglesa. En la “Carta” de Boscán y la “Advertencia” de Wordsworthconsideraremos cuestiones como la configuración de la lengua poética en susrelaciones con la coloquial, la noción de poesía y sus límites, o la dinámicaentre el acercamiento a los modelos literarios previos y la creatividadindividual. Más allá de las dos épocas implicadas, asociaremos lasreflexiones, actitudes y dificultades expuestas por el poeta catalán y el ingléscon las que pueden surgir en el siglo XXI cuando nuevas tendencias literariasintentan consolidarse frente al canon establecido.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".