MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735600437 · doi:10.9790/0853-160603102107

Prevalence of Periodontal Diseases in Orlu Local Government Area of Imo State, Nigeria

2017· article· en· W2735600437 on OpenAlexaff
Ohamaeme Moses C, Egwurugwu Jude N, Ebuenyi Martha C, Ohamaeme Chinyere R, Azudialu Bede C, Egwurugwu Frances U

Bibliographic record

VenueIOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicOral microbiology and periodontitis research
Canadian institutionsHealth Care Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineLocal government areaState (computer science)Environmental healthDentistryTraditional medicineLocal governmentPublic administration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There has been a global pandemic of periodontal diseases with a rising prevalence worldwide. In Nigeria, reported cases of rising prevalence have occurred because of poor oral hygiene, and other related factors. This descriptive survey study was aimed at ascertaining the prevalence of periodontal diseases in Orlu Local Government Area of Imo state, Nigeria. The main instrument for data collection was a structured interview questionnaire bordering on biodata, economic status, oral hygiene, as well as dental care assessment. A sample of 500 was randomly selected from the population i.e males and females of ages between 6-55yeras (schooling and working population). Data collected was analyzed using descriptive statistics of frequency, percentage, histograms, and pie chart. Results showed that 470(94%) respondents have had one form of periodontal disease while 30(6%) never had it. Also pain and bleeding gums had 34.6% and 19.8% and as such the commonest pattern of periodontal disease in the populace. The disease was commoner amongst 16-25years age group i.e 128(27.2%) and there was also a male preponderance of 59.4% against the female of 40.6%.Sixmonthly dental check-up, and health education were recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOSR Journal of Dental and Medical SciencesSame topicOral microbiology and periodontitis researchFrench-language works237,207