MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735646315 · doi:10.7326/acpjc-2000-133-2-070

Women with unstable angina received fewer cardiac procedures than did men but were less likely to develop other cardiac events

2000· article· en· W2735646315 on OpenAlexaffabout
Padma Kaul, Paul W. Armstrong

Bibliographic record

VenueACP Journal Club · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineUnstable anginaAnginaTroponinMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PrognosisSeptember 1, 2000Women with unstable angina received fewer cardiac procedures than did men but were less likely to develop other cardiac eventsPadma Kaul, MSc, Paul W. Armstrong, MDPadma Kaul, MScUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (P.K., P.W.A.)Search for more papers by this author, Paul W. Armstrong, MDUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (P.K., P.W.A.)Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/ACPJC-2000-133-2-070 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Source CitationRoger VL, Farkouh ME, Weston SA, et al. Sex differences in evaluation and outcome of unstable angina. JAMA. 2000 Feb 2;283:646-52. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10665705References1 Armstrong PW, Fu Y, Chang WC, et al. Acute coronary syndromes in the GUSTO-IIb trial: prognostic insights and impact of recurrent ischemia. The GUSTO-IIb Investigators. Circulation. 1998;98:1860-8. Google Scholar2 Iriarte M, Caso R, Murga N, et al. Microvascular angina pectoris in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and diagnostic value of exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:335-9. Google Scholar3 Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, Christenson RH, et al. Cardiac troponin T levels for risk stratification in acute myocardial ischemia. GUSTO IIA Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1333-41. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (P.K., P.W.A.) PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails September 1, 2000Volume 133, Issue 2Page: 70KeywordsAdverse eventsAnginaAngiographyBiomarkersCardiac surgeryCohort studiesDiabetes mellitusElectrocardiographyFallsFamilial hypercholesterolemiaHealth care policyHeartHeart failureHypertensionIschemiaMyocardial infarctionPatientsRevascularizationStable coronary artery diseaseUnstable angina ePublished: 9 March 2020 Issue Published: September 1, 2000 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2000 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.178
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACP Journal ClubSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207