MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2735648430 · doi:10.1109/icnidc.2016.7974533

Energy saving in C-RAN based on BBU switching scheme

2016· article· en· W2735648430 on OpenAlexaff
Honggang Guo, Ke Wang, Hong Ji, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceEnergy consumptionComputer networkBandwidth (computing)BasebandCloud computingScheme (mathematics)Engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cloud radio access network (C-RAN) is a novel mobile network architecture which can reduce energy consumption compare to the traditional RAN. There are lots of baseband units (BBU) in C-RAN. All BBUs are in active mode even when traffic load is light, this brings the problem of high energy consumption in BBU Pool. BBU switching scheme can switch off part of BBUs to save energy. It needs to consider BBUs' resource utilization rate but estimating BBUs' resource utilization rate is a challenging issue and lacks researches. In this paper, firstly we propose a novel scheme to estimate BBUs' resource utilization rate with the consideration of rate requirement of mobile user equipment (MUE), number of MUEs, bandwidth of Remote Radio Head (RRH) and the transmission power between RRH and MUE. Secondly, we provide a combine and remove (CnR) algorithm to decide BBU when to be switched off or to be switched on. It can remove overloaded BBU and underloaded BBU while combine them together and transfer them to normal BBU or sleeping BBU. The algorithm aims to maximize the number of sleeping BBUs without losing of Quality of Service (QoS). Numerical results indicate that the number of sleeping BBUs reaches maximum, BBUs' resource utilization rate keep in normal state and the energy consumption in the BBU Pool varies with the fluctuation of traffic load. In addition, our proposed scheme outperform the primary static scheme and schemes in relevant papers in terms of energy saving in the BBU Pool. The overall system using our scheme also consume less energy compare to the traditional RAN according to the provided energy consumption models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207