Lin‐Gettig syndrome: Craniosynostosis expands the spectrum of the <i>KAT6B</i> related disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report two patients with sagittal craniosynostosis, hypoplastic male genitalia, agenesis of the corpus callosum, thyroid abnormalities, and dysmorphic features which include short palpebral fissures and retrognathia. The clinical presentation of both patients was initially thought to be suggestive of Lin-Gettig syndrome (LGS), a multiple malformation syndrome associated with craniosynostosis that was initially reported in two brothers in 1990, with a third patient reported in 2003. Our first patient was subsequently found through exome sequencing to have a de novo mutation in KAT6B, c.4572dupT, p.(Thr1525Tyrfs*16). The second patient was ascertained as possible LGS, but KAT6B mutation testing was pursued clinically after the identification of the KAT6B mutation in Patient 1, and identified a de novo mutation, c.4205_4206delCT, p.(Ser1402Cysfs*5). The phenotypic spectrum of KAT6B mutations has been expanding since identification of KAT6B mutations in genitopatellar syndrome (GPS) and Say Barber Biesecker Young Simpson (SBBYS) syndrome patients. We show that craniosynostosis, which has not been previously reported in association with KAT6B mutations, may be part of the genitopatellar/Say Barber Biesecker Young Simpson spectrum. These two patients also further demonstrate the overlapping phenotypes of genitopatellar and SBBYS syndromes recently observed by others. Furthermore, we propose that it is possible that one or more of the previous cases of LGS may have also been due to mutation in KAT6B, and that LGS may actually be a variant within the KAT6B spectrum and not a distinct clinical entity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".