Study on New Product Development: Based on the Process Innovation of Organization/ETUDE DU DEVELOPPEMEMNT DE NOUVEAU PRODUIT : BASÉE SUR LE PROCESSUS D'INNOVATION DE L'ORGANISATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The global pressures of modern market are placing an ever-increasing emphasis on the rapid development and introduction of new products. In view of the importance of new product development to the survival and development of enterprises, this paper proposed how process innovation effects the new product development in organization by developing a theoretical model based on the mechanism discussion between them. Based on the methods of factor analysis, correlation analysis and data mining, using IMSS database, an empirical analysis has been done and the theoretical model is proved to be true. At last, this paper gives a case study by represents the research project on DaGang Company. A number of organization deficiencies in the new product development process are identified and proposals based on concurrent engineering subsequently are adopted which enhances the effectiveness of this process. Key words: Concurrent engineering, New product -development, Organizational innovation, Process innovation Resume: La pression globale du marche moderne met l'accent de plus en plus sur le developpement rapide et l'introduction de nouveaux produits. Etant donne l'importance du developpement de nouveaux produits pour la survie et le developpement des entreprises, l'article present examine comment le processus d'innovation influe le developpement de nouveau produit dans l'organisation en developpant un modele theorique base sur le mecanisme de discussion entre eux. Basee sur les methodes de l'analyse de facteurs, l'analyse de correlation et l'extraction des donnees, en utilisant la banque de donnees IMSS, une analyse empirique a deja ete effectuee et le modele theorique est prouve correct. Enfin, l'article donne une etude de cas qui represente le projet de recherche sur l'Entreprise DaGang. Bon nombre d'insuffisances d'organistion dans le processus du developpement de nouveau produit sont identifiees et des propositions fondees sur l'ingenierie simultanee sont adoptees qui amelioreront l'efficacite de ce processus. Mots-Cles: ingenierie simultanee, developpement de nouveau produit, innovation organisationnelle, processus d'innovation 1. INTRODUCTION Increasingly fierce global competition coupled with customers' demand for higher-quality products and delivering in shorter times is forcing manufacturing organizations to adopt radical approaches to new product development. 3 The ability to reduce the time from product conception to introduction in the marketplace now is a prime source of competitive advantage. 4 Manufacturing organizations approach to new product development is a major obstacle to reducing leading times. New product development is not only the core competence but also the basic of survival and development to enterprise. 5 Generally speaking, an emergence of new product always freshen up the organization even the whole industry.6 To face up the fast-changing of customers' demand and the shorter life cycle of product, almost all the organizations need attach a great importance to new product development. A review of available literature shows that there is a large amount of information available describing practices for how new products should be introduced. Companies are therefore faced with a large amount of information highlighting principles that are supposed to help improve processes and increase the chance of introducing successful new products. 7 There is still, however, and imbalance between information specifying whether the process innovation could affect the new product development?8 If so, what needs to be done and how to tackle the problems associated with implementing of process innovation? The practical implications of how to implement idealized new product development principles and incorporating them into an effective business process have therefore not been adequately addressed. This paper describes a reference model which helps address to answer the question and then providing the support organization to the process innovation by a case study. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".