Citizen Unique: Émile Vaillancourt: Forgotten Envoy across the Solitudes / Citoyen unique : Émile Vaillancourt, émissaire oublié entre deux solitudes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robert Stacey had been drafting a letter to the editor of the Toronto Star in response to an article published in the November 27, 1996, issue, a profile by Ronald Hambleton of l’Abbé Arthur Maheux, who figures in William Weintraub’s City Unique: Montreal Days and Nights in the 1940s and ’50s (McClelland and Stewart, 1996). Stacey began writing a review of Weintraub’s book, but as he did so, he came across Joseph-Émile Vaillancourt (1889–1968), whom he referred to as “an early (‘premature’?) pro-federalist but also passionately pro-québécois historian, journalist and animateur of the 1920s–50s who strove in publication after publication to establish a rapprochement between anglophone and francophone Canada.” Stacey also had a connection to Vaillancourt through his grandfather, C.W. Jefferys, who had met up with Vaillancourt in the 1930s when Jefferys was conducting historical tours to Quebec and the Maritimes. Vaillancourt later had a distinguished career as a Canadian diplomat. Stacey’s article was written in the hopes that it would be accepted for publication by the editors of Cité Libre, but it never seems to have been submitted. The essay contains many citations, but Stacey did not include footnotes. To date, no formal biography of Vaillancourt exists.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".