Understanding physical activity motivation for children with DCD: An investigation using the Theory of Planned Behaviour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Developmental coordination disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental condition that affects approximately 5-6% of children (APA, 2000). DCD is a complex disorder resulting in significant impairments to both daily (self-care, school) and recreational activities. Children with DCD have consistently been found to be less physically active compared to typically developing (TD) children (Rivilis et al., 2011); yet, the psychological processes associated with moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) for children with DCD are poorly understood. Using Azjen's (1991) Theory of Planned Behaviour, the purpose of this study was to examine physical activity motivations among children with DCD in comparison to TD children. Participants (N= 105, Mage= 13.25 +.46) were drawn from a larger prospective cohort study (PHAST II), and included children with DCD (n= 47) matched to TD peers (n= 58). As expected, the results found children with DCD scoring significantly lower in intentions F(1,103) = 6.88, p
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".