MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-051 study of pembrolizumab (pembro) in pediatric patients (pts) with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1<sup>+</sup> advanced, relapsed, or refractory solid tumor or lymphoma.

2017· article· en· W2736373206 on OpenAlexaff
Birgit Geoerger, Hyoung Jin Kang, Michal Yalon-Oren, Lynley V. Marshall, Catherine Vézina, Alberto S. Pappo, Theodore W. Laetsch, Antônio Sérgio Petrilli, Rupert Handgretinger, Jacek Toporski, Julia Glade Bender, Wayne Nicholls, Elizabeth Fox, Steven G. DuBois, Margaret E. Macy, Susan L. Cohn, Kumudu Pathiraja, Scott J. Diede, Scot Ebbinghaus, Navin Pinto

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsRefractory (planetary science)Internal medicineMetastatic melanomaLymphomaPhases of clinical researchOncologyMelanomaCancerProgressive diseaseDiseaseSurgeryNuclear medicineClinical trialImmunotherapyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10525 Background: In phase 1 of the KEYNOTE-051 study (NCT02332668), the 2 mg/kg Q3W approved adult dose of pembro was also determined to be the pediatric recommended phase 2 dose. In phase 2, presented herein, we further evaluated this dose in pediatric pts with advanced cancer. Methods: Children aged 6 mo to < 18 y with advanced melanoma or a PD-L1+ advanced, relapsed or refractory solid tumor or lymphoma, measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and performance score ≥50 using Lansky Play or Karnofsky scales received pembro 2 mg/kg Q3W for 35 cycles or until confirmed disease progression per immune-related RECIST by investigator review, intolerable toxicity, or pt/investigator decision to discontinue. Tumor imaging was performed every 8 wk for the first 6 mo, then every 12 wk thereafter. AEs were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0. Key efficacy endpoints were ORR, disease control rate (DCR), and PFS per RECIST v1.1 by investigator and OS. Results: Of 369 pts prescreened, 364 were evaluable for PD-L1 expression; of these, 121 (33.2%) were PD-L1+. 66 pts were enrolled; median follow-up was 2.5 mo (range, 0.2-18). As of the data cutoff (Nov 7, 2016), 23 (34.8%) pts were still on treatment. Median age was 13 y (range, 1-17), 77.3% had metastatic disease, and 34.8% had ≥3 prior lines of therapy for recurrent/metastatic disease. Primary diagnoses were non-CNS solid tumors (n = 45), CNS tumors (n = 16), and lymphoma (n = 5). 5 (7.6%) pts had grade 3-4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), most commonly neutropenia (n = 2). No treatment-related deaths occurred; 1 pt discontinued for a TRAE (grade 3 AST increased). 1 pt each with Hodgkin lymphoma, adrenocortical carcinoma, mesothelioma, and glioblastoma had partial response for an ORR of 6.1% (95% CI, 1.7-14.8); 7 (10.6%) pts had stable disease for a DCR of 16.7% (95% CI, 8.6-27.9). Median PFS and OS were 1.8 mo and 9.2 mo, respectively; 12-mo PFS was 10.2% and OS was 40.5%. Potential effects of pembro on the developing immune system (eg, T and B cells, vaccinated antibodies) will also be presented. Conclusions: Pembro showed low toxicity and warrants further study to determine activity in select pediatric tumors. Enrollment in KEYNOTE-051 is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02332668.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.377 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→