Design, Synthesis and X‐ray Crystal Structure of Iodinated Benzoboroxole Derivatives by Consecutive Metal–Iodine Exchange of 3,4,5‐Triiodoanisole
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of iodinated benzoboroxoles was designed and synthesized by using a successive metal–iodine exchange reaction of 3,4,5‐triiodoanisole. The reactivity and regioselectivity of the metal‐iodine exchange are remarkably controlled and provide the iodinated products in good yields. The synthesized iodobenzoboroxoles were screened for in vitro antimicrobial activity against two Gram‐positive strains of bacteria, Micrococcus luteus (ATCC 9341) and Bacillus cereus (ATCC 11778), and two Gram‐negative strains, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Serratia marcescens (ATCC 27117), by using a well‐diffusion assay and dilution methods. The in vitro antimicrobial evaluation indicated that 4‐iodo‐6‐methoxybenzo[c][1,2]oxaborol‐1(3H)‐ol (compound 24) possesses the most‐potent antibacterial activity against Gram‐positive strains with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.016 and 0.013 mg/mL for Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus cereus, respectively. This report discloses a two‐step protocol for the synthesis of hitherto unknown 4‐iodobenzoboroxole and 7‐iodobenzoboroxole derivatives that is efficient, general in scope and scalable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".