Temperature Distribution in Flux Channels with Discrete Contact Boundary Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An analytical approach for the thermal behavior of two-dimensional rectangular flux channels with arbitrary boundary conditions on the source plane is presented. The boundary condition along the source plane can be a combination of the first kind boundary condition (Dirichlet or prescribed temperature) and the second kind boundary condition (Neumann or prescribed heat flux). To model the boundary conditions along the source plane, the method of least squares is used. The proposed solution is in the form of Fourier series expansion and can be applied to both symmetrical and non-symmetrical channels. This method is more general than other approaches and there is no need to use equivalent heat flux distributions to model isothermal heat sources. The general approach for obtaining the multidimensional temperature profile in flux channels and the advantages of the least-square method is discussed. The proposed solution can be used to calculate the temperature at any specified point in the flux channel. Two case studies are presented. The first case study is a flux channel with five discretely specified contact temperatures along the source plane. The second case study has both of the first kind and second kind boundary conditions on the source plane. The analytical results for both systems are compared with finite element method using a commercial software package. It is shown that the proposed approach can precisely model the temperature profile over the flux channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".