MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736708993 · doi:10.1080/01457632.2017.1357747

Temperature Distribution in Flux Channels with Discrete Contact Boundary Conditions

2017· article· en· W2736708993 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHeat Transfer Engineering · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermal Analysis in Power Transmission
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeat fluxBoundary value problemPlane (geometry)Boundary (topology)MechanicsFlux (metallurgy)Fourier seriesMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryMathematicsMaterials scienceHeat transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analytical approach for the thermal behavior of two-dimensional rectangular flux channels with arbitrary boundary conditions on the source plane is presented. The boundary condition along the source plane can be a combination of the first kind boundary condition (Dirichlet or prescribed temperature) and the second kind boundary condition (Neumann or prescribed heat flux). To model the boundary conditions along the source plane, the method of least squares is used. The proposed solution is in the form of Fourier series expansion and can be applied to both symmetrical and non-symmetrical channels. This method is more general than other approaches and there is no need to use equivalent heat flux distributions to model isothermal heat sources. The general approach for obtaining the multidimensional temperature profile in flux channels and the advantages of the least-square method is discussed. The proposed solution can be used to calculate the temperature at any specified point in the flux channel. Two case studies are presented. The first case study is a flux channel with five discretely specified contact temperatures along the source plane. The second case study has both of the first kind and second kind boundary conditions on the source plane. The analytical results for both systems are compared with finite element method using a commercial software package. It is shown that the proposed approach can precisely model the temperature profile over the flux channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it