Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunosuppressive therapy is a known risk factor for opportunistic infections. We report the first case of severe Pneumocystis jirovecii infection requiring intensive care in a pediatric patient with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The literature was reviewed and there were 92 reported cases of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in patients with IBD. Most sources were case reports and there was likely reporting bias towards patients receiving immunomodulators, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy and those who died. Overall, 56% of patients were male and 58% had crohn’s disease (CD). The median age was 45 years (interquartile range 30-68, range 8-78) and 86% of patients were lymphopenic. The case-fatality rate was 23%. Corticosteroids were used as IBD treatment in 88% of patients who subsequently developed PCP, 42% received thiopurines, 44% used anti-TNF therapy and 15% received either ciclosporin or tacrolimus. Rates of mono, dual, triple and quadruple immunosuppression therapy were 35%, 35%, 29% and 2% respectively. This report highlights the importance of considering PCP in immunosuppressed lymphopenic pediatric IBD patients who present with unusual symptoms. Moreover, it should give gastroenterologists the impetus to limit immunosuppressive therapy to its minimal effective dose and consider options such as exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) wherever possible. Although there is no place for global PCP prophylaxis in IBD given the low incidence, in an era when there is increasing use of biologic agents with combination immunosuppressive therapy, the risk-benefit profile of PCP chemoprophylaxis should be revisited in selected cohorts such as patients on triple immunosuppression with corticosteroids, thiopurines and a biological agent or calcineurin inhibitor, especially in lymphopenic individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".