MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2736981025 · doi:10.5539/apr.v9n4p59

Trigonometric Functions Above and Below of the Double-Slit Barrier

2017· article· en· W2736981025 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jiřı́ Stávek

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsDouble-slit experimentProjection (relational algebra)TrigonometryRectangular potential barrierSlitSpace (punctuation)OpticsClassical mechanicsQuantumQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Double-Slit Experiment with individual electrons represents the central mystery of quantum mechanics and was voted by readers of Physics World as the most beautiful experiment in physics. In our trigonometric model we have divided the Young-Feynman double-slit interferometer into two zones: Aristotelian mixing chamber (the space between the entrance slit S0 and above the double-slit barrier with slits S1 and S2 where particles have been reflected (Euclid) and/or randomly deviated – parenklisis of Epicurus) and Plato’s projection chamber (the space below the double-slit barrier and above the projection screen). Aristotelian mixing chamber represents the classical hidden variable: individual particles have been reflected and/or randomly deviated in this zone and later pass through the double-slit barrier in such a way that they create probability distributions of single particles described by the very well known trigonometric relations. The double-slit barrier serves as a “self-organizing filter” for reflected and/or deviated individual particles and creates an order in the population densities among individual particles. For the experimental evaluation of this trigonometric model we propose to insert an internal and external “sfumato mirrors” for the quantitative manipulation of probability distributions of individual particles. The concept “sfumato” was inspired by the Old Master Leonardo da Vinci (see his picture Mona Lisa) (“sfumato” means “smoke”). Sfumato mirrors represent the classical observable variable and their influence on the resulting probability densities of individual particles can be trigonometrically described. Sfumato mirrors must not absorb any particles. In another experimental modification we can insert below one slit of the double-slit barrier an “absorption chiaroscuro mask” to fully remove those penetrating particles from the system and thus manipulate with the probability distribution observed with one opened slit (“chiaroscuro” means “light-dark”). It could be of interest to observe the resulting probability distribution of individual particles registered on the projection screen from one opened slit S1 or S2. The absorption chiaroscuro mask must not reflect particles back to the Aristotelian mixing chamber or to the Plato´s projection chamber. The results of these experiments will decide if we are just going up in a blind alley”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics ResearchSame topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207