MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2737354000 · doi:10.1177/070674370505000116

Capgras Syndrome in the Modern Era: Self Misidentification on an ID Picture

2005· letter· en· W2737354000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sylvain Grignon, Mikaël Trottier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · 2005
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOlanzapinePsychiatryRisperidoneCapgras SyndromeAnxietyPsychologyParanoiaIdeationDepression (economics)Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming)MedicineDelusion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor: Treatment refusal, which often involves resistance to feeding, is common in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) (1-5).We report the first case of a patient with AN who tied a knot at the gastric end of a feeding tube to avoiding being fed. Case ReportA single woman, aged 19 years, was admitted as an emergency to the medical ward of our hospital for feeding and medical management of severe malnutrition, dehydration, and acute renal failure due to AN.Her admission height and weight were 172 cm and 37.7 kg (body mass index 12.7 kg/m 2 ).One year before admission, her weight had been 63.3 kg (body mass index 21.4 kg/m 2 ).Over the year, she had increased her exercise, decreased her food intake, and increased her use of laxatives.We estimated that her average daily food intake for the last 3 months was 300 to 500 kcal.During the week before admission, she experienced weakness, persistent light-headedness, and difficulty completing her usual activities of daily living.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0070.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of PsychiatrySame topicBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesFrench-language works237,207