Density and Viscosity of Athabasca Bitumen, a Condensate Sample, and Mixtures Applicable for Expanding-Solvent Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage and Liquid-Addition-to-Steam-for-Enhancing-Recovery Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary This paper presents the density and viscosity measurements for a condensate sample, Athabasca bitumen, and Athabasca bitumen/condensate mixtures applicable for in-situ bitumen-recovery methods and pipeline transportation. The measurements for the densities and viscosities are reported at different temperatures (ambient to 200°C) and pressures (atmospheric to 10 MPa). For mixtures, a wide range of solvent fractions (5-50 wt%) is investigated. The data for the mixtures are also evaluated with predictive schemes as well as with correlation models representing certain mixing rules proposed in the literature. The results indicate that mixture densities are well represented by the excess-volume method, with an average absolute relative deviation (AARD) of 0.78%. The Bij model predicts the mixture viscosities with an AARD of 11.7%.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".