Assessing the impacts of intra- and interspecific competition between <i>Triticum aestivum</i> and <i>Trifolium repens</i> on the species’ responses to ozone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tropospheric ozone is considered to be the most phytotoxic air pollutant because of its oxidizing power. The main objective of this study was to analyze the effect of intra- and interspecific competition between Triticum aestivum L. and Trifolium repens L. on the responses to high concentrations of ozone of both species, and the role of the symbiotic relationship Rhizobium – T. repens on the abovementioned responses. Monocultures and mixtures of both species in different densities were sown. Pots were transferred to open top chambers either with 90–120 ppb ozone or without ozone. Ozone had an overall negative impact on leaf area and biomass production per individual plant. These responses were dependent on species and sowing density in monocultures, but were not changed by species proportion in the mixtures. There was a positive relationship between Rhizobium nodules and plant biomass, with a tendency for smaller plants to present lower number of nodules under ozone. These results suggest that competitive and mutualistic interactions could have a greater role in determining responses to novel air pollutants than species sensitivity to the xenobiotic, per se.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".