Bibliographic record
Abstract
EnglishThe pursuit of parental claims under section 7 of the Charter has required courts to expand the liberty rights jurisprudence beyond the confines of a minimal notion of physical liberty. In so doing, the Supreme Court of Canada has added to a small but growing number of cases that recognize an “irreducible sphere of personal autonomy” or privacy rights under section 7. The parental rights claims, however, are particularly contradictory, revealing a deeply embedded and more pervasive tension between the individualist values of classical liberalism and the deference to traditional family values typical of conservative ideologies. The key features of these two currents in legal and political discourse are examined and compared in order to explicate more fully their uneasy fusion in the parental rights case-law. The constitutionalization of traditional family relationships represented by the parental rights decisions provides an important counterpoint to Charter case-law that aims to introduce notions of substantive equality and pluralism to family law discourses. francaisLa poursuite de demandes de prestations parentales en vertu de l’article 7 de la Charte a exige des tribunaux qu’ils elargissent la jurisprudence des droits de la liberte au-dela des limites de la simple notion de liberte physique. En agissant ainsi, la Cour supreme du Canada est venue enrichir un petit nombre grandissant de causes qui reconnaissent «une sphere irreductible d’autonomie personnelle» ou des droits a la vie privee en vertu de l’article 7. Cependant, les demandes de prestations parentales sont particulierement contradictoires en ce sens qu’elles revelent une tension profondement ancree et plus envahissante entre les valeurs individualistes du liberalisme classique et la deference des valeurs familiales traditionnelles des ideologies conservatrices. Les elements cles de ces deux courants du discours legal et politique sont examines et compares dans le but d’expliquer plus en detail leur fusion precaire dans la jurisprudence des droits parentaux. La constitutionnalisation des relations familiales traditionnelles telles qu’elles sont representees par les decisions en matiere de droits parentaux fournit un contrepoint important a la jurisprudence de la Charte qui cherche a introduire des notions substantielles d’egalite et de pluralisme dans le discours du droit de la famille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.033 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".