The role of potent thiols in Chardonnay wine aroma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Aims Polyfunctional thiols are key aroma compounds in many Sauvignon Blanc wines, but their role in other white cultivars is not clear. Methods and Results A survey of 106 commercial Australian Chardonnay wines found a high concentration of 3-mercaptohexan-1-ol, 3-mercaptohexyl acetate, benzyl mercaptan and 4-mercapto-4-methylpentan-2-one, with nearly all wines having a concentration of all compounds well above their reported sensory detection threshold, and some having a concentration comparable to that found in highly fruity Sauvignon Blanc wines. Wines were made on a research scale from a set of Chardonnay juices sourced from 16 vineyards across Australia. Sensory descriptive analysis combined with quantitative aroma volatile data revealed that several aroma and flavour attributes were related to the concentration of the thiols. Conclusions This study provided evidence that substantial flavour in Chardonnay can be contributed by these thiols. Additionally, consumer acceptance data showed that wines with a higher thiol concentration were liked by most consumers. Significance of the Study This study revealed the importance of polyfunctional thiols in Chardonnay wine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it