Long‐Range Antiferromagnetic Order on Spin Ladders SrFe<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>O and SrFe<sub>2</sub>Se<sub>2</sub>O As Probed by Neutron Diffraction and Mössbauer Spectroscopy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Powder neutron diffraction data on spin ladder compounds SrFe2Ch2O (Ch = S, Se) indicate that their magnetic ground states feature long‐range antiferromagnetic spin ordering with k = [0,0,0]. The superexchange interaction is antiferromagnetic across each rung via oxygen but ferromagnetic along the ladders via Ch. At 10 K, the ordered spins point towards the center of the ladders but are faintly canted away from a collinear state. The sizes of the ordered moments are 3.3 and 3.5 µB Fe–1 for SrFe2S2O and SrFe2Se2O, respectively. The polar, heteroleptic, tetrahedral FeCh3O coordination suggests an angle of 8° between the local structure polarity and the magnetic moment spin orientation. Mössbauer spectroscopic data confirm the magnetic ordering scenario and indicate that the local Fe–O bond rules the electric field gradient at the Fe‐site.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".