Bibliographic record
Abstract
RESUMEN La constitucionalidad implica la plenitud del ordenamiento juridico de un Estado, cuyo funcionamiento garantice pleno respeto de los derechos de los ciudadanos, la adecuada operatividad de los organos del Estado y un marco de paz, desarrollo y justicia para toda una colectividad nacional. Es decir, la constitucionalidad debe convertirse en el sustento de una verdadera democracia. Pero, lo que cualquier ciudadano debe plantearse es si la constitucionalidad existe o es un ideal y, si es tal, en que medida se puede acercar a ella. Palabras clave: Constitucionalidad, democracia, derecho ciudadano, normas juridicas. ABSTRACT Constitutionality imply the juridical classification of a State, whose functioning guarantees the full respect of the rights of the citizens, the suitable operability of the organs of the State, and a frame of peace, development, and justice for the whole national collectivity. That is why, constitutionality is called to be the support of the real democracy. But, What any citizen must appear is if constitutionality exists or it is only an ideal and, if it is so, in what measure it is possible to bring over to her. This matter deserves a special study. Key words: Constitutionality, democracy, citizen right, legal rules.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".