ESCRT-Independent Surface Receptor And Transporter Protein Degradation By The ILF Pathway
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Surface receptor and transporter protein down-regulation drives cell signaling, quality control and metabolism underlying diverse physiology. After endocytosis, proteins are delivered to endosomes where ESCRTs package them into intralumenal vesicles, which are degraded by acid hydrolases upon fusion with lysosomes. However, reports of ESCRT-independent surface protein degradation are emerging suggesting that alternative, non-canonical pathways exist. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model, here we show that in response to substrates, protein misfolding or TOR signaling, some internalized surface transporters (Hxt3, Itr1, Aqr1) bypass ESCRTs en route to the lysosome membrane where they are sorted into an area that is internalized as an intralumenal fragment (ILF) and degraded upon organelle fusion. This ILF pathway also degrades typical ESCRT client proteins (Mup1, Can1, Ste3) when ESCRT function is impaired. As the underlying machinery is conserved, we speculate that the ILF pathway is an important contributor to receptor and transporter down-regulation in all eukaryotes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".