HIV/AIDS and the experience of a Canadian NGO and another Brazilian
Bibliographic record
Abstract
People living with HIV/AIDS (PHA) have been facing many difficulties in their lives because they are discriminated in various contexts, such as family, community, and work. Currently, AIDS Non-Governmental Organizations (AIDS/NGOs) have become increasingly important because, beyond providing traditional social support, they also offer an environment where PHA may openly express and share not only their experiences with HIV/AIDS, but they can change their personal and professional projetcts. We analyzed historical documents, in-depth interviews, and questionnaires answered by community members within two AIDS/NGOs, one in London, Ontario, Canada (NGO-Ca) and another in Greater Sao Paulo, Brazil (NGO-Br). In this article, some pathways of political participation, which are relevant to both communities, are discussed. Surely, this may contribute to the decreasing of stigma and discrimination related to HIV/AIDS: compassion and altruism as a bridge to political participation, effects on activism, and fostering based on solidarity and co-responsibility are also important discussed issues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".