The relation of ego-integrity to mental health in older adults with moderate depressive symptoms
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development, the psychosocial issue of the last life-stage is centered on ego-integrity versus egodespair. This psychosocial issue is based on life-review and the assumption that older adults reflect upon their past. Integrity involves feelings of meaning and acceptance, whereas despair involves feelings of regret about the course of one’s life. This study examines the relation of ego-integrity to mental health in a sample of Dutch older adults with moderate depressive symptoms (40-82 years; N = 174). This study uses the baseline data of an RCT on the effectiveness of life-review therapy as guided self-help. The Northwestern Ego Integrity Scale was used to measure ego-integrity and ego-despair. Both positive mental health, using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, and psychopathology, using the Brief Symptom Inventory were measured. Results show that higher integrity and lower despair are related to higher positive mental health, with the strongest relations for integrity. Despair is positively related to psychopathology. Moderator analysis of ego-integrity and age to psychopathology shows that integrity is also negatively related to psychopathology, but only in the youngest age group of 40-55 years. The results remain when controlled for age, gender, educational level and subjective health. In conclusion, both ego-integrity and ego-despair are related to mental health in older adults with moderate depressive symptoms. This suggests that promotion of ego-integrity by increasing feelings of meaning and acceptance in one’s life might be an effective target in interventions to increase older adults’ mental health, such as in life-review therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".