MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738407987

What men want: A qualitative investigation of men's health concerns and relevant health and physical activity message content for men

2011· article· en· W2738407987 on OpenAlex
Alexandra Hatchell, Marie Clarke, Stacey Kimura, Amy E. Latimer‐Cheung

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Exercise, Movement, and Sport · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral Health and Interventions
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyHealth promotionRelevance (law)Focus groupQualitative researchPsychological interventionContent analysisPhysical activitySocial psychologyApplied psychologyMedicinePublic healthNursingSociologyPolitical sciencePhysical therapy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite having an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, men engage in fewer health-promoting behaviors than women. Informational health resources and health-promotion interventions for men are lacking. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative investigation using the Extended Parallel Process Model (EPPM; Witte, 1992) as a guiding framework. The purpose of this study was to examine the relevance and applicability of EPPM constructs for health messages. However, physical activity emerged as a prominent theme. Consequently, this study also provides insight into the applicability of the EPPM for developing physical activity messages for men. Four semi-structured focus groups and four semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted. Participants discussed the relevance of EPPM constructs to health messages and provided feedback about health advertisements and messages. Participants included 26 men (M age = 37 ± 7.3 years) who were generally active (80.77%). Participants easily related to the EPPM constructs of susceptibility, severity, response efficacy and self-efficacy to health messaging. In discussing these constructs, perceptions of control emerged as a theme and physical activity was identified as a controllable and desirable behavior. Participants indicated that self-efficacy could be enhanced by adopting self-regulatory strategies (e.g. planning) to engage in health behaviors such as physical activity. When evaluating health magazines and health messages based upon the tenets of the EPPM, participants preferred messages that included demographically-tailored facts and statistics, reputable sources, strong language and sex appeal. From these findings, we have formulated preliminary recommendations regarding theory-based content for health and physical activity messages for men. Acknowledgments: Hastings and Prince Edward Counties Health Unit

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.184
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it