MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738470140

Longitudinal evaluation of serum markers of endothelial cell dysfunction and haemostasis in treated antiphospholipid syndrome and healthy pregnancies

2001· article· en· W2738470140 on OpenAlexaff
Sophia Stone, Paul T. Seed, Kiran Parmar, Lucilla Poston, B. J. Hunt

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Portal (King's College London) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsWomen's Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntiphospholipid syndromeMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionImmunologyPregnancyInternal medicineAntibodyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) pregnancies are characterised by placental insufficiency leading to recurrent fetal deaths and pre-eclampsia, placental abruption and/or maternal thrombotic events. In vitro antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) can produce endothelial cell activation (ECA). We hypothesised that the placental dysfunction seen in APS pregnancies was related to ECA in the maternal circulation which may predispose to poor placentation with failed endovascular trophoblast invasion into the maternal spiral arteries of the placental bed. Resultant decidual vasculopathy, characteristic of growth restricted and pre-eclamptic pregnancies, may lead to the above pregnancy complications. We collected clinical data and sequential blood samples from 22 primary APS pregnancies and 22 control pregnancies. All APS pregnancies received aspirin and low molecular weight (LMW) heparin (Fragmin). Three APS women with previous cerebral thrombotic events, who developed cerebral symptoms on LMW heparin, were prescribed warfarin from the 2nd trimester. The control pregnancies were untreated. We measured the following markers of haemostatic activation and ECA by ELISA: prothrombin fragments 1+2 (PF 1+2), D-dimers, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sol-ICAM) and soluble thrombomodulin (sTM), a marker of endothelial cell damage. Statistical analysis was conducted on logged values (log-normal distribution) and results presented as geometric means. The gestational ages were rounded into 4-week groups to allow analysis of repeated measures using generalised estimating equations (GEE). Clinical outcome: All control pregnancies were uncomplicated. In the APS group, there were 3 cases of intra-uterine growth restriction of the fetuses, 1 case of placental abruption, 2 women developed pre-eclampsia and there were 4 preterm deliveries. Of the maternal complications 5 women developed transient ischaemic attacks (TIAs) but not completed cerebral events and one woman developed thrombotic microangiopathy in pregnancy. There was no difference in the levels of ICAM or PAI-1 whether analysed by direct comparison, effect of treatment or according to outcome; t-PA levels were significantly higher in APS group (p=0.002); sTM levels were significantly lower in the APS group (p=0.02); PF 1+2 levels increased during pregnancy, increased less in the APS group (not statistically significant p=0.08) but was significantly lower in those receiving warfarin and in the group with maternal complications (p=0.018). D-dimer levels were significantly lower in those receiving warfarin (p=0.042). Conclusion: There is no evidence of generalised ECA in treated APS pregnancies compared to healthy controls. Levels of fibrinolytic activity were higher in APS pregnancies. A significant number of patients (23%) had TIAs on heparin but those that switched to warfarin had no further events. This may be because warfarin had a significantly greater effect on suppressing coagulation activation than LMW heparin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Portal (King's College London)Same topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207