The Power of Mother: Archetype and Symbolism in the Harry Potter series
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The importance of family unit, and mothers in particular, has been at the heart of much work in children's literature since the age of oral storytelling. Numerous stories revolved around different aspects of mother(ly) characters, and many were created in honour of mothers. Accordingly, Dr. Seuss and Roald Dahl often spoke openly of the beneficial influence their mothers had on their writing. On the other hand, J. M. Barrie's mother's obsession with his deceased brother was the most likely cause of Barrie's psychogenic dwarfism, resulting in one of the most distinguishable characters in children's literature, Peter Pan. Similarly, J. K. Rowling's loss of mother and her status as a single mother at the onset of the Harry Potter series reportedly had a great impact on the development of the novels. This paper, therefore, focuses on the figure of mother, absent, substitute and symbolic, in the Harry Potter series by J. K. Rowling. By examining the Jungian mother archetype and its manifestation on various symbolic levels, it will be discussed how Rowling's narrative of loss intensifies vicarious experience on the part of the reader. Furthermore, the author's biographical data and identity as an important part in the construction of the seven novels will be intertwined with the fictional and linked to “orphanhood” and “Otherness” evident in the Harry Potter series. Finally, it will be shown in which way the power of the mother figure has brought into existence the defining of the central characters, institutional structure, spells and magic, as well as creation of original language and neologisms. Taking into account the postmodern and poststructuralist feminist theories, it will be discussed in which way language and literary discourse shape individual experience, the primary reason why the Harry Potter series, a mixture of genres and worlds, constitutes an immensely powerful contemporary work of fiction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".