MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W273860362

Families, History, and Social Change: Life-Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives

2002· article· en· W273860362 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Erica Owens

Bibliographic record

VenueFamily Relations · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdeologyLife course approachField (mathematics)Family lifeSocial changeSociologySocial sciencePsychologyEnvironmental ethicsHistoryGender studiesSocial psychologyPolitical sciencePoliticsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hareven, T. K. (1999). Families, History; and Social Change: Life-Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 334 pages. ISBN 0-8133-9079-6. Price: $28.00. After decades of debate, family scholars still disagree on the nature and impact of family change. Some insist that the family is in danger of disintegration. Others assert that change is indicative of the dynamic adaptability of the family system. In Families, History, and Social Change: Life-Course and Cross-Cultural Perspectives, Hareven helps separate ideology from fact and achieves her stated goal of helping family scholars to understand the family in various contexts of change, while allowing the levels of complexity play themselves out at different points in historical (p. 3). Hareven has divided her book into four parts. The first section, on continuity and change in family and kin relationships, details the growth of the field of family history and provides an example of how such family research is conducted. In the first chapter, Hareven explains the progression of family history by noting major research trends and illustrating these trends with selected studies conducted in the field over the past 3 decades. The examples include descriptions of the methods used in the research, the major findings of the study, and the impact of the research on future work. As a result, the chapter succeeds on two counts. First, the flow of research in this complex field is illustrated clearly. Second, the chapter serves as a strong starting point for family scholars in search of historical studies on a certain subject or using a certain method. In chapter 2, Hareven presents her research on French-Canadian immigrant textile workers employed by Amoskeag Mills in Manchester, New Hampshire, between 1880 and 1930. Her data are drawn from sources including letters, employee files and employment records, and vital records. Hareven shows how the availability of work influenced migration and how chain migration in turn influenced the structure of the work community through kinship work networks and training. The detail provided in this chapter is critical the success of the rest of the book, as Hareven draws from these same data make her case in later chapters. Chapter 3 illustrates how families employ collective yet flexible strategies negotiate social and economic change. In section 2, the impact of time and place on family relationships and processes is explored. Hareven shows how children's social networks have become increasingly stable and age-- homogenous over the course of the 20th century. Single-parent families and stepfamilies are not introducing new difficulties but reintroducing some of the complexities of kin networks that children once commonly experienced. Other chapters in this section explore the relationship between adult children and aged parents. Hareven notes that intergenerational kin support has historically provided a reciprocal benefit for adult children and aging parents. However, social and economic conditions affect who cares for aging parents and how strongly this care is expected. The timing of life course transitions is shown be fluid over time and across cultures, and kin need is one factor that influences the life course trajectory. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0100.027
Scholarly communication0.0090.016
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFamily RelationsSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207