MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2738836311 · doi:10.82308/45579

Biopile bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soils from a sub-Arctic site

2010· article· en· W2738836311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jessica Snelgrove

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioremediationPetroleumEnvironmental scienceSoil waterHydrocarbonContaminationSoil contaminationBiostimulationEnvironmental remediationArcticPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental chemistryWaste managementEnvironmental engineeringGeologySoil scienceChemistryEcologyEngineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Petroleum contamination of several hundred sites in the northern arctic and sub-arctic regions of Canada has occurred as a result of petroleum oil exploration and use of petroleum fuels for heating, transportation and electricity generation. Petroleum contamination can persist in the ground for long periods of time and be a source of long-term environmental contamination. Bioremediation is a non-disruptive and often cost-effective technology for remediation of petroleum-contaminated sites that involves the microbial degradation of hydrocarbon compounds. Biopiles allow for rapid ex-situ treatment of petroleum-hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Two pilot scale biopiles (300 kg soil each) were construct using soils contaminated with approximately 1 500 mg/kg total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) from Norman Wells, North West Territories. Both systems were supplied with oxygen to stimulate aerobic conditions, and monitored in an enclosed room maintained at a temperature of 15oC, the ambient summer temperature in Norman Wells. One biopile was amended with ammonium nitrate at a ratio of 100:5:1 (C:N:P) to determine the effects of nutrients on TPH biodegradation. The research showed that biodegradation occurred within both biopile systems. Analysis of the hydrocarbon fractions, TPH chromatograms, and oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production supported biodegradation versus volatilization. However, an absolute confirmation of whether these loses were due to biodegradation (or to what extent) are not possible to be reported here. Analysis of the inorganic nitrogen and aggregation of the soils helped provide insight into the process of biodegradation in both biopile systems. Overall 42% of the total petroleum hydrocarbons were removed from the nutrient amended biopile and 38 % in the control biopile. For the F2 (>C10-16) fraction, both systems had less than 200 mg/kg soil and for the F3 (>C16-34) fraction around 700 mg/kg soil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactantsFrench-language works237,207