Posterior fossa syndrome and long-term neuropsychological outcomes among children treated for medulloblastoma on a multi-institutional, prospective study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients treated for medulloblastoma who experience posterior fossa syndrome (PFS) demonstrate increased risk for neurocognitive impairment at one year post diagnosis. The aim of the study was to examine longitudinal trajectories of neuropsychological outcomes in patients who experienced PFS compared with patients who did not. METHODS: Participants were 36 patients (22 males) who experienced PFS and 36 comparison patients (21 males) who were matched on age at diagnosis and treatment exposure but did not experience PFS. All patients underwent serial evaluation of neurocognitive functioning spanning 1 to 5 years post diagnosis. RESULTS: The PFS group demonstrated lower estimated mean scores at 1, 3, and 5 years post diagnosis on measures of general intellectual ability, processing speed, broad attention, working memory, and spatial relations compared with the non-PFS group. The PFS group exhibited estimated mean scores that were at least one standard deviation below the mean for intellectual ability, processing speed, and broad attention across all time points and for working memory by 5 years post diagnosis. Processing speed was stable over time. Attention and working memory declined over time. Despite some change over time, caregiver ratings of executive function and behavior problem symptoms remained within the average range. CONCLUSION: Compared with patients who do not experience PFS, patients who experience PFS exhibit greater neurocognitive impairment, show little recovery over time, and decline further in some domains. Findings highlight the particularly high risk for long-term neurocognitive problems in patients who experience PFS and the need for close follow-up and intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it