Early Termination in Parametric Linear System Solving and Rational Function Vector Recovery with Error Correction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consider solving a black box linear system, A(u) x = b(u), where the entries are polynomials in u over a field K, and A(u) is full rank. The solution, x = 1/g(u) f(u), where g is always the least common monic denominator, can be found by evaluating the system at distinct points ξl in K. The solution can be recovered even if some evaluations are erroneous. In [Boyer and Kaltofen, Proc. SNC 2014] the problem is solved with an algorithm that generalizes Welch/Berlekamp decoding of an algebraic Reed-Solomon code. Their algorithm requires the sum of a degree bound for the numerators plus a degree bound for the denominator of the solution. It is possible that the degree bounds input to their algorithm grossly overestimate the actual degrees. We describe an algorithm that given the same inputs uses possibly fewer evaluations to compute the solution. We introduce a second count for the number of evaluations required to recover the solution based on work by Stanley Cabay. The Cabay count includes bounds for the highest degree polynomial in the coefficient matrix and right side vector, but does not require solution degree bounds. Instead our algorithm iterates until the Cabay termination criterion is reached. At this point our algorithm returns the solution. Assuming we have the actual degrees for all necessary input parameters, we give the criterion that determines when the Cabay count is fewer than the generalized Welch/Berlekamp count.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.047 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".