MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739427257 · doi:10.20381/ruor-11282

Neoarchean evolution of the western-central Wabigoon boundary zone, Brightsand Forest Area, Ontario.

2002· dissertation· en· W2739427257 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Brown

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2002
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoundary (topology)GeographyGeologyForestryPhysical geographyArchaeologyEarth science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The boundary between the western and central domains of the Wabigoon subprovince has been considered to represent a ca. 2.7 Ga suture between juvenile Neoarchean volcanic rocks in the west and granitoid rocks with Mesoarchean ancestry in the central Wabigoon. The nature and timing of interaction between these two terranes was examined southeast of the Sturgeon Lake greenstone belt within the central Wabigoon, where amphibolite-facies supracrustal remnants are dismembered by Neoarchean plutonic rocks and shear zones. Of the 4 preserved ductile deformation fabrics, D1 and D2 are bracketed by a 2718 +/- 7 Ma tonalite gneiss and crosscutting 2715 Ma tonalite dyke. The main penetrative S3 foliation affects most units, including quartz-rich sandstone deposited after 2701 Ma. A 2697 Ma granodiorite dyke cutting S3 in mafic and metasedimentary rocks provides a lower bracket on D3. Regional implications can be drawn from the observation of 2725--2715 Ma D1 and D2 deformation events in the central Wabigoon. These constraints overlap with an early deformation event in the Pipestone Lake area of the western Wabigoon (2727--2712 Ma; Edwards and Stauffer, 1999). (Abstract shortened by UMI.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207