An arbitrary high order discontinuous Galerkin scheme for the elastodynamic equations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present in this paper the formulation of a non-dissipative arbitrary high order time domain scheme for the elastodynamic equations. Our approach combines the use of an arbitrary high order discontinuous Galerkin interpolation with centred flux in space, with an arbitrary high order leapfrog scheme in time. Numerical two dimensionnal results are presented for the schemes from order two to order four. In these simulations, we discuss of the numerical stability and the numerical convergence of the schemes on the homogeneous eigenmode problem. We also show the ability of the computed schemes to carry out more complex propagation probems by simulating the Garvin test with an explosive source. The results show the high accuracy of the method, both on triangular regular and irregular meshes. Nous présentons dans ce papier une méthode Galerkin discontinu d’ordre arbitrairementélevé pour les équations de l’élastodynamique en domaine temporel. Notre approche combine uneinterpolation spatiale d’ordre arbitraire, des flux centrés ainsi qu’un schéma saute-mouton d’ordrearbitrairement élevé pour l’intégration temporelle. Des résultats numériques de la propagation d’unmode propre 2D sont présentés dans le cas des schémas saute-mouton d’ordre 2 et 4. Une étudenumérique de la stabilité et de la convergence de la méthode est également proposée, ainsi qu’uneapplication du schéma à la résolution d’un problème de propagation plus complexe: le test de Garvin.Ces différentes simulations montrent que le schéma développé est très précis, aussi bien sur desmaillages réguliers que non réguliers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".