MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739693212 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3351

Abstract 3351: Aberrant RNA editing of GLI1 promotes malignant regeneration in multiple myeloma

2017· article· en· W2739693212 on OpenAlexaff
Elisa Lazzari, Nathaniel P. Delos Santos, Christina Wu, Heather Leu, Gabriel Pineda, Shawn Ali, Caitlin Costello, Mark Minden, Raffaella Chiaramonte, Leslie Crews, Catriona Jamieson

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRNA editingBiologyCancer researchRNAAdenosine deaminaseADARPlasma cell leukemiaMultiple myelomaGenome editingAdenosineImmunologyGeneGeneticsCRISPR

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Despite novel therapies, most of multiple myeloma (MM) patients relapse as a result of clonal evolution in inflammatory microenvironments. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, driven by inflammatory cytokine-responsive adenosine deaminase acting on RNA1 (ADAR1), promotes cancer progression by enhancing survival and self-renewal of malignant progenitor cells. Amplifications of chromosome 1q21, containing IL-6R and ADAR1 loci, occur frequently in high-risk MM patients, who frequently develop secondary plasma cell leukemia (PCL) and have shorter survival. While increased IL-6 signaling has been linked to relapse and A-to-I editing contributes to therapeutic resistance in a broad array of malignancies, the role of ADAR1 in MM pathogenesis has not been elucidated. This study aimed to investigate whether pro-inflammatory cues in MM activate ADAR1 editing thereby promoting malignant regeneration. Procedures: Publicly available primary patient datasets were analyzed and validated in a separate cohort of biobanked primary samples and human myeloma cell lines. Lentiviral vector-mediated activation or knockdown of ADAR1, or treatment with extrinsic pro-inflammatory stimuli, was utilized to probe the functional impact of RNA editing activity in MM models. Site-specific qPCR was used to quantify RNA editing in specific cancer stem cell-associated loci. Functional effects of ADAR1 activity were assessed in in vitro survival and self-renewal assays, and in novel in vivo PCL xenografts. Results: Patients harboring 1q21 amplification showed significant and stage-dependent increases in ADAR1 expression. In a set of separate primary PCL samples, aberrant RNA editing in the coding region of the Hedgehog (Hh) pathway transcription factor GLI1 was observed in high ADAR1-expressing samples. Notably, increased GLI1 editing, previously reported to have increased capacity to activate its transcriptional targets, was detected in serially transplantable, patient-derived xenograft models. Furthermore, abolition of ADAR1 editase activity impaired GLI1 editing. Lastly, in vitro pro-inflammatory IL-6 stimulation, or continuous exposure to the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide led to increased ADAR1 mRNA and protein levels, with a concomitant induction of RNA editing activity. Conclusions: In MM, 1q21 amplification has been linked to progression. We provide new evidence linking expression and activity of ADAR1, located on 1q21, and disease stage. Because ADAR1 induces transcript recoding, A-to-I editing could contribute to the marked transcriptomic diversity typical of advanced MM. While the Hh pathway has been linked to cancer stem cell generation in human MM, here we identified a primate-specific mechanism of Hh pathway activation in MM through RNA editing-dependent stabilization of GLI1. Together, both genetic and microenvironmental factors modulate epitranscriptomic deregulation of cancer stem cell pathways in MM. Citation Format: Elisa Lazzari, Nathaniel Delos Santos, Christina Wu, Heather Leu, Gabriel Pineda, Shawn Ali, Caitlin Costello, Mark Minden, Raffaella Chiaramonte, Leslie Crews, Catriona Jamieson. Aberrant RNA editing of GLI1 promotes malignant regeneration in multiple myeloma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3351. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3351

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207