MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2739754888 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-3981

Abstract 3981: The Shc1 scaffold protein simultaneously balances Stat1 and Stat3 activity in breast cancer to promote immune suppression and resistance to immunotherapy

2017· article· en· W2739754888 on OpenAlexaff
Ryuhjin Ahn, Kévin Jacquet, Marc R. Fabian, Sidong Huang, Nicolas Bisson, Josie Ursini‐Siegel

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinomeCancer researchImmune systemTyrosineSTAT1Immune checkpointTumor microenvironmentBreast cancerTyrosine kinaseSignal transductionImmunotherapyReceptor tyrosine kinasePhosphorylationSH2 domainBiologyCancerMedicineImmunologyCell biologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Receptor and cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases are key signal integrators in poor outcome breast cancers that are central to the establishment of an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Immunotherapies represent an emerging approach within the armament of anti-cancer agents. Although the efficacy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors relies, in part, on their ability to augment adaptive immunity, the increased heterogeneity and functional redundancy of the tyrosine kinome in poor outcome breast cancers represents a significant hurdle to achieving durable responses to immunotherapies. We previously identified the Shc1 (ShcA) scaffold protein, a central regulator of tyrosine kinase signaling, as essential for promoting immune suppression. We recently showed that the ShcA pathway simultaneously activates STAT3 immunosuppressive signals and impairs STAT1-driven immune surveillance in breast cancer cells. Impaired phosphorylation of select tyrosine residues on ShcA potently and selectively reduces STAT3 activation in breast tumors, profoundly sensitizing them to immune checkpoint inhibitors and tumor vaccines. Meanwhile, impaired phosphorylation of other select tyrosine residues on ShcA potently increased antigen presentation and sensitivity to tumor vaccines in preclinical mouse models. Based on these results, we have set out to elucidate protein interactors dependent on distinct ShcA phospho-tyrosines to regulate STAT1 and STAT3 signaling axis that aid tumor driven immune suppression. We combined affinity-purification mass spectrometry (AP/MS) and proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) followed by mass spectrometry (BioID/MS). Known interactors of ShcA as well novel interactors have been identified. Promising candidates that could be critical in immune suppression downstream of ShcA have been validated to be true interactors by co-IP and BioID assays. They have been screened for immune regulation in vitro for further modulation in vivo. Currently, inhibitors of phospho-tyrosine motifs of ShcA do not exists. Therefore, the development of pharmacological inhibitors to prevent phospho-tyrosine ShcA dependent STAT3 signaling or relieve suppression of STAT1 signaling may be an attractive method to strategically sensitize breast tumors to multiple immunotherapies. Citation Format: Ryuhjin Ahn, Kévin Jacquet, Marc Fabian, Sidong Huang, Nicolas Bisson, Josie Ursini-Siegel. The Shc1 scaffold protein simultaneously balances Stat1 and Stat3 activity in breast cancer to promote immune suppression and resistance to immunotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3981. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-3981

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research→French-language works237,207→