MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739894180 · doi:10.5539/jsd.v10n4p65

Simulation Analysis of Policy for Waste Treatment toward a Sound Material-cycle Society in Tokyo

2017· article· en· W2739894180 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noriko Nozaki, Keyu Lu, Rajeev Kumar Singh, Takeshi Mizunoya, Helmut Yabar, Yoshiro Higano

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sustainable Development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSustainable Industrial Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGreenhouse gasSubsidyMunicipal solid wasteMetropolitan areaNatural resource economicsSound (geography)Resource (disambiguation)ProductivityEnergy consumptionConsumption (sociology)BusinessWaste managementEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental economicsEconomicsEconomic growthEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enhancing resource productivity is effective to improve trade-off between the environment and economy. For minimizing consumption of natural resources required for economic activities, it is necessary to strengthen both material recycling and energy utilization, which reduce final disposal amount and return waste to economic activities as resource.This study seeks to clarify environmental economic policy for promoting establishment of sound material-cycle society subject to keeping or expanding the regional economic scale, and enhancing the amount of material recycling and reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Study area is Tokyo metropolitan area. To reduce GHG emissions and final disposal amount, we consider promoting both material recycling and energy utilization thoroughly. Under these circumstances, we construct an expanded input-output model. The model includes the flows of waste and energy, and emissions of GHG. With restrictions on GHG emissions, Gross Regional Product (GRP) is maximized as the objective function. We quantitatively analyze how much tax and subsidy on discharging waste is required for sound material-cycle society along with analysis on effects of the policy by model simulation.The results show that, with 10 yen/kg tax on discharging waste, final disposal amount per GRP was 11% lower than the baseline case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Sustainable DevelopmentSame topicSustainable Industrial EcologyFrench-language works237,207