MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2739928744

Western Newfoundland’s Anti-Fracking Campaign: Exploring the Rise of Unexpected Community Mobilization

2017· article· en· W2739928744 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Angela Carter, Leah Fusco

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of rural and community development · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpposition (politics)Political sciencePoliticsMobilizationContext (archaeology)EconomyPublic administrationGeographyArchaeologyLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article aims to account for the unexpected rise of community mobilization against hydraulic fracturing (fracking) in western Newfoundland, Canada, since 2012. The oil industry is a significant economic driver in the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, and historically there has been very limited organized local public opposition to oil extraction in the province. Moreover, the western Newfoundland region is characterized by economic hardship and limited experience mobilizing against development projects, factors unlikely to foster mobilization. Yet in 2012, highly organized, dynamic, and broad-ranging opposition to fracking arose in this region, contributing to the provincial government’s de facto moratorium on fracking and creation of an external review process, the result of which makes fracking unlikely in the near future. Drawing predominantly on fieldwork and interviews from across the region, we attempt to understand this rise of community mobilization first by referencing McAdam and Boudet’s (2012) framework, which explores the key variables of political opportunities, civic capacity, and community context. However, finding that this framework cannot fully account for the rise of mobilization in western Newfoundland, we discuss what we understand as the central factors in this case: the dynamics of local citizens building a globally informed yet locally resonant anti-fracking campaign. Keywords: hydraulic fracturing (fracking); oil development; community mobilization; Western Newfoundland; Newfoundland and Labrador Resume Cet article vise a prendre en compte la hausse inattendue de la mobilisation de la communaute contre la fracturation (fracking) hydraulique a l'ouest de la province de Terre-Neuve, au Canada, depuis 2012. L'industrie petroliere est un important moteur economique dans la province de Terre-Neuve et Labrador et historiquement, il y a eu tres peu d'opposition publique locale organisee contre l'extraction de petrole dans la province. En outre, la partie ouest de Terre-Neuve est caracterisee par des difficultes economiques et une experience limitee dans la mobilisation contre les projets de developpement, facteurs peu susceptibles a favoriser la mobilisation. Pourtant, en 2012, une opposition extremement organisee, dynamique et etendue, s'eleve contre la fracturation dans cette region, contribuant au moratoire provincial de facto sur la fracturation et a la creation d'un processus de revision externe, rendant ainsi la fracturation peu probable dans un avenir proche. A partir principalement de donnees tirees sur le terrain et lors des entrevues a travers la region, nous avons tente de comprendre cette hausse de la mobilisation de la communaute d'abord en mentionnant les travaux de McAdam et Boudet’s (2012) qui explorent les variables cle des opportunites politiques, la capacite civique et le contexte de la communaute. Toutefois, etant donne que cette etude ne peut pas completement expliquer l'augmentation de la mobilisation dans l'ouest de la province de Terre-Neuve, nous discutons ce que nous pensons etre les facteurs principaux dans ce cas: les dynamiques entre citoyens locaux dans l'elaboration d'une campagne globalement informee, d'anti-fracturation a retombee locale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2017
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of rural and community developmentSame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207