Automated full-range pressure-volume curves in mice and rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pressure-volume (PV) curves constructed over the entire lung volume range can reliably detect functional changes in mouse models of lung diseases. In the present study, we constructed full-range PV curves in healthy and elastase-treated mice using either a classic manually operated technique or an automated approach using a computer-controlled piston ventilator [flexiVent FX; Scientific Respiratory Equipment (SCIREQ), Montreal, Quebec, Canada]. On the day of the experiment, subjects were anesthetized, tracheotomized, and mechanically ventilated. Following an initial respiratory mechanics scan and degassing of the lungs with 100% O 2 , full-range PV curves were constructed using either the classic or the automated technique. In control mice, superimposable curves were obtained, and statistical equivalence was attained between the two methodologies. In the elastase-treated ones, where significant changes in respiratory mechanics and lung volumes were expected, very small differences were observed between the two techniques, and the criteria for statistical equivalence were met in two out of four parameters assessed. The automated technique was adapted to rats and used to estimate the functional residual capacity (FRC) by volume subtraction. This novel approach generated FRC estimates consistent with the literature, with added accuracy relative to the existing method in diseased subjects. In conclusion, the automated technique generated full-range PV curves that were equivalent or very close to those obtained with the classic method under physiological or severe pathological conditions. The automation facilitated some technical aspects of the procedure, eased its use across species, and helped derive a more accurate estimate of FRC in preclinical models of respiratory disease. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Partial and full-range pressure-volume (PV) curves are frequently used to characterize lung disease models. Whereas automated techniques exist to construct partial PV curves, a manually operated approach is classically employed to build the full-range ones. In this study, the full-range PV curve technique was automated using a computer-controlled piston ventilator. The automation simplified the technique, facilitated its extension to other species, and inspired a novel way of estimating the functional residual capacity in laboratory rodents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".