MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740118740 · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14835

Diagnostic accuracy of haptoglobin within ovarian cyst fluid as a potential point‐of‐care test for epithelial ovarian cancer: an observational study

2017· article· en· W2740118740 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueBJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHemoglobin structure and function
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational University Health SystemNational Healthcare GroupQueen's UniversityNational University of SingaporeQueen's University BelfastNational Medical Research CouncilSupport for Pioneering Research Initiated by the Next Generation
KeywordsHaptoglobinMedicineOvarian cancerMalignancyBiomarkerCystInternal medicineGastroenterologyReceiver operating characteristicCancerPathologyGynecologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To investigate haptoglobin within ovarian cyst fluid (OCF) as a diagnostic biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) and develop an in vitro diagnostic point-of-care device test (IVDPCT) for use in the operating theatre. DESIGN: Retrospective and prospective cohort study. SETTING: South-East Asia. POPULATION: Women with suspicious ovarian cysts. METHODS: Proteomic, immunohistochemical and ELISA methods measured haptoglobin in OCF to differentiate benign and EOCs. Diagnostic performance of haptoglobin was compared with CA125, risk malignancy indices (RMI) and frozen section. Blinded validation of the IVDPCT was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prediction of malignancy. RESULTS: Haptoglobin concentration measured by ELISA was 0.70 ± 0.09 mg/ml in patients with benign cysts (n = 87), 6.22 ± 0.53 mg/ml in early stage-EOC (n = 17), and 6.57 ± 0.65 mg/ml in late stage-EOC (n = 20). Haptoglobin in EOCs was significantly higher than in benign cysts (P < 0.0001). Haptoglobin using rapid colorimetric assay (RCA) on a training set had a sensitivity of 97.3% and a specificity 92.0%, comparable to ELISA and frozen sections. The haptoglobin AUROC curve was 0.999 (95% CI 0.997-1.000) compared with 0.895 (95% CI 0.814-0.977, P < 0.05) for CA125. Haptoglobin performed significantly better than all the RMIs (P < 0.01). Blinded validation studies showed a minor drop in average diagnostic performance (sensitivity 85.2% and specificity 90.5%) compared with the training set. However, when compared with frozen section, haptoglobin was no worse in diagnostic accuracy for malignancy. CONCLUSION: Haptoglobin was identified as a biomarker for the detection of EOC with potential as a point-of-care diagnostic tool. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Haptoglobin within ovarian cyst fluid: a biomarker for epithelial ovarian cancer and point-of-care diagnostics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.225
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it