MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740227314 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-107

Abstract 107: Mechanism of anticancer activity of BPS-001 (lyophilized leech saliva extract)

2017· article· en· W2740227314 on OpenAlexaff
Amr Ammar, Emma S. Tomlinson Guns, Omer Kucuk, Abdualrahman Mohammed Abdualkader, Mohamed Alaama, A. B. M. Helal Uddin, Abbas Mohammad Ghawi, Mohamed M. Hassona

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare and Venom Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLNCaPIn vivoProstate cancerCancer researchIn vitroChemistryAngiogenesisCancerPharmacologyMedicineBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent studies, investigating the composition and therapeutic potential of leech saliva have identified many peptides and proteins with multiple therapeutic properties including anti-thrombotic, antimicrobial and anti-metastatic. In vitro anti-cancer effects were shown in breast, prostate and lung cells lines. In vivo anticancer activity of the extract was shown in multiple breast and prostate cancer xenografts studied by our lab. In our previous studies, BPS-001 was non-toxic and demonstrated various activities including pro-apoptotic properties, inhibition of cellular adhesion, angiogenesis and downregulation of AR expression. To investigate the affected pathways, mechanistic studies were carried out using in vivo and in vitro treated samples. Protein expression in samples was determined by Western blotting of in vitro and in vivo samples. AR expression was measured using an eGFP reporter assay in LNCaP cells, with PSA also measured in the media using cobas e 411 analyzer. BPS-001 inhibited Proteinase Activated Receptor 1 (PAR-1) which is responsible for hormone like cellular signals in different cancer cells including those of the breast and prostate. Moreover, in LNCaP cells AR activation and PSA expression were significantly inhibited after treatment with BPS-001. Inhibition of PI3K and PLCG2 were also observed. It has been found that BPS-001 modulates a plethora of pathways which makes it a very promising candidate for treatment of cancer with an important advantage of low toxicity and potential resistance. Citation Format: Amr Ammar, Emma Guns, Omer Kucuk, Abdualrahman Abdualkader, Mohamed Alaama, A.B.M. Helal Uddin, Abbas Ghawi, Mohamed Hassona. Mechanism of anticancer activity of BPS-001 (lyophilized leech saliva extract) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 107. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-107

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.320
GPT teacher head0.556
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicHealthcare and Venom ResearchFrench-language works237,207