MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740363593 · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12618

Production performance and milk fatty acid profile in grazing dairy cows offered ground corn or liquid molasses as the sole supplemental nonstructural carbohydrate source

2017· article· en· W2740363593 on OpenAlexaff
A.F. Brito, K.J. Soder, P.Y. Chouinard, S.F. Reis, Stephen A. Ross, M.D. Rubano, Michael D. Casler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersAgricultural Research ServiceNational Institute of Food and AgricultureNew Hampshire Agricultural Experiment StationU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsGrazingMilkingAnimal scienceRandomized block designForagePastureDry matterFatty acidChemistryExcretionUric acidFood scienceBiologyAgronomyBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of ground corn or liquid molasses fed as the sole supplemental nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) source on production performance, milk fatty acid (FA) profile, grazing behavior, and N metabolism in grazing dairy cows. A strip-grazing management system was used, with cows offered a new strip of fresh herbage after each milking, resulting in approximately 16 h of access to pasture daily. Animals were fed a diet formulated to yield an 86:14 forage-to-concentrate ratio consisting [dry matter (DM) basis] of 74% mixed grass-legume herbage, 12% mixed-mostly legume baleage, 12% NSC source, and 2% mineral-vitamin premix. Twenty Jersey cows averaging (mean ± standard deviation) 121 ± 73 d in milk in the beginning of the study were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 herbage supplementation treatments: (1) baleage plus ground corn (B+GC) or (2) baleage + liquid molasses (B+LM). Both NSC sources were fed at a flat rate of 1.6 kg of DM/cow daily. The study lasted from June to September for a total of 15 wk with data and sample collection conducted in wk 3, 7, 12, and 15. Milk samples for FA analysis were collected in wk 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 13. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) for a randomized complete block design with repeated measures over time. Treatment × week interactions were observed for supplement DM intake, milk urea N, bite rate, urinary excretion of uric acid, and milk FA (e.g., 17:0, 18:0, cis-9,trans-11 18:2). Supplement DM intake was greatest in cows fed B+LM in wk 7, 12, and 15. Compared with cows fed B+GC, those fed B+LM had lower concentrations of milk urea N in wk 7 and 15. Milk yield, concentrations and yields of milk components, and plasma concentrations of essential AA, except Met, which was lowest with feeding B+LM, were not affected by supplementation. The plasma concentration of urea N was lowest with feeding B+LM. Cows fed B+GC spent more time grazing than those fed B+LM. Feeding B+GC increased cis-9 18:1 FA and most trans-18:1 FA in milk, whereas B+LM increased Σ odd-chain FA, Σ n-3 FA, and the trans-11 18:1 to trans-10 18:1 ratio, and decreased the n-6 to n-3 ratio. Based on current results, B+LM can entirely replace B+GC without negatively affecting milk yield or yields and concentrations of milk fat and true protein, while decreasing milk urea N, plasma urea N, and the milk trans-11 18:1 to trans-10 18:1 ratio, and increasing Σ n-3 FA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207