MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740805685 · doi:10.1111/hdi.12586

Platelet activation and clotting cascade activation by dialyzers designed for high volume online hemodiafiltration

2017· article· en· W2740805685 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kamonwan Tangvoraphonkchai, Anne Riddell, Andrew Davenport

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Society of Nephrology
KeywordsMedicinePlatelet activationHemodialysisPlateletActivated clotting timeHeparinDialysisTissue factorUrologyCoagulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis patients are pro-thrombotic. Higher volume online postdilutional hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF), with increasing hematocrit increases the risk of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit (ECC). We wished to determine whether OL-HDF increased platelet activation and ECC clotting. METHODS: Coagulation parameters, platelet, white cell, and endothelial activation markers were measured at the start and end of dialysis sessions in 10 patients and also pre- and post-dialyzer after 15 minutes using two different dialyzers designed for high volume OL-HDF; cellulose triacetate (TAGP) and polysulphone (PS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Patients were anticoagulated with a heparin bolus. FINDINGS: At the start of OL-HDF, D dimers, thrombin antithrombin complexes (TATs), and soluble adhesions molecules (sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1) were increased. Post-treatment soluble P selectin (PS/PVP 26.7 ± 7.1 versus 36.6 ± 9.9; TAGP 28.7 ± 7.2 versus 43.5 ± 8.4 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and soluble CD40 ligand (PS/PVP 297 ± 228 versus 552 ± 272, TAGP 245 ± 187 versus 390 ± 205 ng/ml, P < 0.05) increased. Post-dialyzer concentrations increased versus pre-dialyzer for tissue factor (PS/PVP 117 ± 12 versus 136 ± 16, TAGP 100 ± 25 versus 128 ± 40 ng/ml, P < 0.05), factor VIIIc (PS/PVP 174 ± 54 versus 237 ± 83, TAGP 163 ± 60 versus 247 ± 102 IU/ml, P < 0.01), sVCAM-1 (PS/PVP 782 ± 64 versus 918 ± 140, TAGP 722 ± 121 versus 889 ± 168 ng/ml, P < 0.01), and D-dimers (PS/PVP 292 ± 132 versus 355 ± 167, TAGP 300 ± 129 versus 391 ± 171 ng/ml, P < 0.001). There was no macroscopic thrombus noted in the ECC, and no increase in microparticles, platelet factor-4, or TATs. DISCUSSION: Despite being pro-thrombotic, with activation of platelets, and lymphocytes during passage through ECC, no macroscopic clotting, or increased TATs were noted during OL-HDF, and no major differences between cellulosic and polysulphone dialyzers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis InternationalSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207