MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740813659

Structure Behavior of Thin Sections Casting with Self-Compacting Concrete under Flexure

2017· article· en· W2740813659 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Zeinab A. Etman, Ibrahim M. El‐Mehasseb

Bibliographic record

VenueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative concrete reinforcement materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteStructural engineeringWeldingCrackingMaterials scienceCastingDeflection (physics)Finite element methodSteel barEngineeringComposite material
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Self-compacting concrete (SCC) was first developed in Japan about 30 years ago in order to reach durable concrete structure. The concept of SCC was proposed to reduce labors in the placement of concrete by elimination or reducing the need for vibration to achieve consolidation and suitability for all scales needed. This research aimed to investigate the feasibility of using self-compacting concrete in civil engineering applications as a producing a precast unit used in tunnel. An experimental program was carried out and a finite element model with ANSYS15 was adopted. This paper presented applications of self-compacted concrete for casting thin structural hollow members. These members can be used as precast units in construction of tunnel to decrease the problems in high way roads due to the difficulty of using crossing bridges especially for children and old people which are very useful for developing countries with great economic advantages. A total of fourteen hollow beams were casted and tested. The main variables taken into consideration were the type of reinforcement (reinforced steel bar and steel wire meshes), the types of steel wire meshes (expanded and welded steel wire mesh), number of layers of steel meshes, cross section thickness of concrete, concrete cover thickness and the shape of cross section (square or circular). Special attention to initial cracking load, ultimate load, deflection, cracking pattern, energy absorption and ductility index were investigated. Results showed using welded wire mesh improves the behavior of hollow beams compared with expanded welded wire mesh as the energy absorption and ductility index was increased by 25 % and 10 %, respectively for cross sections reinforced with welded mesh compared with cross sections reinforced with Expanded mesh. Keywords : self-compacting concrete, wire mesh, precast tunnel, thin members, ductility index, energy absorption.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNova Journal of Engineering and Applied SciencesSame topicInnovative concrete reinforcement materialsFrench-language works237,207