MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2740904755 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4688

Abstract 4688: AVID200: a novel computationally-designed TGF beta trap promoting anti-tumor T cell activity

2017· article· en· W2740904755 on OpenAlexaff
Maureen D. O'Connor‐McCourt, Anne E.G. Lenferink, John C. Zwaagstra, Traian Sulea, Catherine Collins, Renu Singh, Yves Durocher, Christiane Cantin, James Koropatnick

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer researchCancer immunotherapyImmunotherapyCD8T cellTGF beta signaling pathwayImmune systemTransforming growth factor betaTumor progressionMedicineImmunologyBiologyChemistryCancerReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract AVID200 is a computationally-designed, avidity-enhanced, receptor ectodomain-based trap that binds and neutralizes TGF-beta 1 and 3 with low pM potency. Of the three TGF-beta isoforms, blockade of TGF-beta 2 has been shown to promote cancer metastasis. Therefore, AVID200 is designed to inhibit TGF-beta 1 and 3 only. TGF-beta is a strongly immunosuppressive molecule that, when expressed by cancers, mediates escape from immune surveillance. Increased TGF-beta ligand promotes cancer progression by suppressing anti-tumor immunity, predominantly by suppressing recruitment and activation of anti-tumor T cells. Consequently, TGF-beta is an important therapeutic target in cancer.AVID200 immunotherapy blocks the capacity of TGF-beta 1 and 3 ligands to interact with their receptors. That blockage induces T cell infiltration into tumors, thereby promoting a "T cell-inflamed" tumor state. Multiple trap formats with differing in vitro blocking potency, biophysical traits, and circulating half-lives in rodents have been designed, synthesized, and tested. On the basis of favorable characteristics, the AVID200 molecule was selected for in vivo assessment of efficacy in inhibiting growth of syngeneic 4T1 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) homografts in immunocompetent host mice. In addition, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells isolated from draining lymph nodes of 4T1 tumor-bearing mice, treated and untreated with AVID200 and other candidate TGF-beta traps, were assessed for activities important in anti-tumor immune activity. We report that AVID200 immunotherapy decreased T-cell apoptosis, stimulated T-cell proliferation in response to tumor cell lysate-loaded dendritic cells, and enhanced the capacity of T-cells to specifically recognize and kill 4T1 tumor cells in ex vivo 2D cultures. The effect of combining AVID200 with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of syngeneic homografts in immune-competent mice is being assessed. AVID200 is a promising new immunotherapy to selectively inhibit the TGF-beta 1 and 3 isoforms, thereby enhancing desirable anti-tumor immunity while avoiding the tumor-promoting effects resulting from TGF-beta 2 neutralization. Citation Format: Maureen D. O'Connor-McCourt, Anne E. Lenferink, John Zwaagstra, Traian Sulea, Catherine Collins, Renu Singh, Yves Durocher, Christiane Cantin, James Koropatnick. AVID200: a novel computationally-designed TGF beta trap promoting anti-tumor T cell activity [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4688. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4688

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207