MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741029780 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.055203

Polarization transfer observables in elastic electron-proton scattering at <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>, 5.2, 6.8, and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mn>8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo> </mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>GeV</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math>

2017· article· lv· W2741029780 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2017
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
FundersNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsObservablePolarization (electrochemistry)ScatteringMomentum transferNuclear physicsElectronProtonNucleonElastic scatteringElectron scatteringPhotonAtomic physicsParticle physicsComputational physicsOpticsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Interest in the behavior of nucleon electromagnetic form factors at large momentum transfers has steadily increased since the discovery, using polarization observables, of the rapid decrease of the ratio ${G}_{E}^{p}/{G}_{M}^{p}$ of the proton's electric and magnetic form factors for momentum transfers ${Q}^{2}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1$ ${\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, in strong disagreement with previous extractions of this ratio using the traditional Rosenbluth separation technique.Purpose: The GEp-III and $\mathrm{GEp}\text{\ensuremath{-}}2\ensuremath{\gamma}$ experiments were carried out in Jefferson Laboratory's (JLab's) Hall C from 2007 to 2008, to extend the knowledge of ${G}_{E}^{p}/{G}_{M}^{p}$ to the highest practically achievable ${Q}^{2}$ given the maximum beam energy of 6 GeV and to search for effects beyond the Born approximation in polarization transfer observables of elastic $\stackrel{P\vec}{e}p$ scattering. This article provides an expanded description of the common experimental apparatus and data analysis procedures, and reports the results of a final reanalysis of the data from both experiments, including the previously unpublished results of the full-acceptance dataset of the $\mathrm{GEp}\text{\ensuremath{-}}2\ensuremath{\gamma}$ experiment.Methods: Polarization transfer observables in elastic $\stackrel{P\vec}{e}p\ensuremath{\rightarrow}e\stackrel{P\vec}{p}$ scattering were measured at central ${Q}^{2}$ values of 2.5, 5.2, 6.8, and 8.54 ${\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$. At ${Q}^{2}=2.5\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, data were obtained for central values of the virtual photon polarization parameter $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ of 0.149, 0.632, and 0.783. The Hall C High Momentum Spectrometer detected and measured the polarization of protons recoiling elastically from collisions of JLab's polarized electron beam with a liquid hydrogen target. A large-acceptance electromagnetic calorimeter detected the elastically scattered electrons in coincidence to suppress inelastic backgrounds.Results: The final GEp-III data are largely unchanged relative to the originally published results. The statistical uncertainties of the final $\mathrm{GEp}\text{\ensuremath{-}}2\ensuremath{\gamma}$ data are significantly reduced at $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=0.632$ and 0.783 relative to the original publication.Conclusions: The final GEp-III results show that the decrease with ${Q}^{2}$ of ${G}_{E}^{p}/{G}_{M}^{p}$ continues to ${Q}^{2}=8.5\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, but at a slowing rate relative to the approximately linear decrease observed in earlier Hall A measurements. At ${Q}^{2}=8.5\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, ${G}_{E}^{p}/{G}_{M}^{p}$ remains positive but is consistent with zero. At ${Q}^{2}=2.5\phantom{\rule{4pt}{0ex}}{\mathrm{GeV}}^{2}$, ${G}_{E}^{p}/{G}_{M}^{p}$ derived from the polarization component ratio $R\ensuremath{\propto}{P}_{t}/{P}_{\ensuremath{\ell}}$ shows no statistically significant $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ dependence, as expected in the Born approximation. On the other hand, the ratio ${P}_{\ensuremath{\ell}}/{P}_{\ensuremath{\ell}}^{\mathrm{Born}}$ of the longitudinal polarization transfer component to its Born value shows an enhancement of roughly 1.7% at $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=0.783$ relative to $\ensuremath{\epsilon}=0.149$, with $\ensuremath{\approx}2.2\ensuremath{\sigma}$ significance based on the total uncertainty, implying a similar effect in the transverse component ${P}_{t}$ that cancels in the ratio $R$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0060.006
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it