MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741031999

ZAŠTO MAJOR JACK NIJE MOGAO DORUČKOVATI? / WHY MAJOR JACK COULD NOT HAVE HIS BREAKFAST?

2016· article· en· W2741031999 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hikmet Karčić

Bibliographic record

VenueNovi Muallim · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicBalkan and Eastern European Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UDK 341.485(497.6=163.4*3)”1941/1945” 94(497.6 Visegrad)”1941/1945” Sažetak U oktobru 1943. godine, Visegrad je zauzet od strane Jugoslovenske vojske u otadžbini (JVuO) poznatije kao “cetnici”. Nakon pada grada, veci dio bosnjackog civilnog stanovnistva krece u zbjeg prema Sarajevu. Ostatak civila ubijen je u masovnom pogubljenu od strane cetnika. Cilj ovog rada je da predstavi do sada nepoznate cinjenice o ulozi saveznickih oficira u ovoj operaciji te da se rasvijetle događaji iz oktobra 1943. Okupacija Visegrada kao i zlocini pocinjeni bice sagledani kroz cetiri gledista: Krvava cuprija na Drini autora Mustafe Suceske; Izvjestaj “Misija Mihailovicu” Alberta Stieza, odlomak Cetnicki pohod na istocnu Bosnu (“Treci Racicev ustanak”) autora Save Pređe te Srbi protiv Vermahta autora Miloslav Samardžic. Na ovaj nacin nastojali smo sagledati bosnjacku, saveznicku, jugoslovensku i srpsku verziju pada Visegrada i zlocini koji se potom pocinjeni. Kljucne rijeci: Visegrad, Bosnjaci, Drugi svjetski rat, genocid Summary In October 1943, Visegrad was occupied by Yugoslav army in the Homeland (JVuO), better known as “Cetniks”. As the city was captured, the greater part of Bosniak population migrated, as refugees, towards Sarajevo. The remaining civilians were killed in a mass-slaughter committed by Cetniks. This article presents some, until now unknown, facts about the role of allied army officers in this particular operation and sheds further light upon the events of the October 1943. The occupation of the city Visegrad and the crimes committed thereof shall be viewed from within four aspects: Krvava cuprija na Drini (The bloody bridge on Drina) by the author Mustafa Suceska, the Report Misija Mihailovicu (the Mission for Mihailovic) by Albert Stiez, the chapter Cetnik’s envasion of eastern Bosnia (The third uprising led by Racic) by Sava Pređa and Srbi protiv Vermahta (Serbs against Wehrmacht) by Miloslav Samardžic. Thus we attempted to present Bosniak, allied, Yugoslav and Serbian perceptions of the event of the seizure of Visegrad and the crimes committed there. Key words: Visegrad, Bosniaks, Second World War, genocide captivity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovi MuallimSame topicBalkan and Eastern European StudiesFrench-language works237,207