ZAŠTO MAJOR JACK NIJE MOGAO DORUČKOVATI? / WHY MAJOR JACK COULD NOT HAVE HIS BREAKFAST?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UDK 341.485(497.6=163.4*3)”1941/1945” 94(497.6 Visegrad)”1941/1945” Sažetak U oktobru 1943. godine, Visegrad je zauzet od strane Jugoslovenske vojske u otadžbini (JVuO) poznatije kao “cetnici”. Nakon pada grada, veci dio bosnjackog civilnog stanovnistva krece u zbjeg prema Sarajevu. Ostatak civila ubijen je u masovnom pogubljenu od strane cetnika. Cilj ovog rada je da predstavi do sada nepoznate cinjenice o ulozi saveznickih oficira u ovoj operaciji te da se rasvijetle događaji iz oktobra 1943. Okupacija Visegrada kao i zlocini pocinjeni bice sagledani kroz cetiri gledista: Krvava cuprija na Drini autora Mustafe Suceske; Izvjestaj “Misija Mihailovicu” Alberta Stieza, odlomak Cetnicki pohod na istocnu Bosnu (“Treci Racicev ustanak”) autora Save Pređe te Srbi protiv Vermahta autora Miloslav Samardžic. Na ovaj nacin nastojali smo sagledati bosnjacku, saveznicku, jugoslovensku i srpsku verziju pada Visegrada i zlocini koji se potom pocinjeni. Kljucne rijeci: Visegrad, Bosnjaci, Drugi svjetski rat, genocid Summary In October 1943, Visegrad was occupied by Yugoslav army in the Homeland (JVuO), better known as “Cetniks”. As the city was captured, the greater part of Bosniak population migrated, as refugees, towards Sarajevo. The remaining civilians were killed in a mass-slaughter committed by Cetniks. This article presents some, until now unknown, facts about the role of allied army officers in this particular operation and sheds further light upon the events of the October 1943. The occupation of the city Visegrad and the crimes committed thereof shall be viewed from within four aspects: Krvava cuprija na Drini (The bloody bridge on Drina) by the author Mustafa Suceska, the Report Misija Mihailovicu (the Mission for Mihailovic) by Albert Stiez, the chapter Cetnik’s envasion of eastern Bosnia (The third uprising led by Racic) by Sava Pređa and Srbi protiv Vermahta (Serbs against Wehrmacht) by Miloslav Samardžic. Thus we attempted to present Bosniak, allied, Yugoslav and Serbian perceptions of the event of the seizure of Visegrad and the crimes committed there. Key words: Visegrad, Bosniaks, Second World War, genocide captivity
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.109 | 0.023 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".