Cultural Value Transformation in Traditional Market Spatial Planning in City of Denpasar, Gianyar and Klungkung – Bali, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the cultural values that underlie the formation of traditional market spatial patterns. In this research will be studied traditional market spatial pattern, change-morphology, hidden cultural values in the form of the morphology, and the factors that cause change. This research takes place in traditional markets in the city of Denpasar, Gianyar, and Klungkung, Bali Indonesia. This research uses descriptive qualitative method with multi layer mapping technique and interview. The results of this study indicate that the morphology of traditional markets on a city scale is one of the three pillars of palace power: political, economic and cultural. At footprint scale of the traditional market morphology is a transformation of the conception of the spatial value of traditional Balinese space that places the function of the purity zones. From the beginning of the formation of the market there are some morphological changes both on the scale of the city and the scale of the site, especially with regard to the placement of the shrine. The main factors causing the change are political and cultural change. Political factors started in the fall of the castle into the hands of the invaders and the cultural factor is the community's attempt to restore the market zoning to a more appropriate traditional spatial conception.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it