MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2741306092 · doi:10.1109/icc.2017.7997143

Energy-efficient predictive video streaming under demand uncertainties

2017· article· en· W2741306092 on OpenAlexaff
Ramy Atawia, Hossam S. Hassanein, Aboelmagd Noureldin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationQuality of serviceSession (web analytics)WirelessWireless networkLinear programmingMathematical optimizationReal-time computingComputer networkDistributed computingAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Highly predictable users' location and traffic have enabled a new video delivery paradigm over wireless networks referred to as Predictive Resource Allocation (PRA). Existing research assumes perfect prediction of information in order to derive the performance bounds of PRA and define its gains over conventional Resource Allocation (RA). In this paper we sustain the application of energy-efficient PRA under prediction uncertainties. To that end, we propose a stochastic robust PRA scheme that models the uncertainty in future demands and incorporates them in the mathematical formulation. A linear Recourse Programming (RP) model is adopted in order to represent the trade-off between the energy-savings and the risk of wasting resources while considering the probability of a user terminating or skipping the video session. Thus, avoids prebuffering the video chunks that might be skipped by the user. A low complexity near optimal algorithm is then introduced to provide real-time solutions for the formulated RP model. Simulation results demonstrate the ability of the introduced robust PRA to deliver energy-efficient video streaming with lower resources than the existing PRA while promising QoS satisfaction. These results provide the impetus to implement the robust PRA in future wireless networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.678
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207