MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract CT054: Phase II study of dianhydrogalactitol in patients with <i>MGMT</i>-unmethylated bevacizumab-naive recurrent glioblastoma

2017· article· en· W2741543570 on OpenAlexaff
Barbara O’Brien, Jeffrey Bacha, Dennis Brown, Anne Steinø, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena Lopez, Marta Peñas-Prado

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsDelmar (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideBevacizumabMedicineTolerabilityOncologyRegimenInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchRadiation therapyDacarbazineCancer researchClinical trialChemotherapyAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain cancer. Current standard of care includes surgery, radiation and treatment with temozolomide (TMZ), however nearly all tumors recur and the prognosis for recurrent GBM is dismal. Most GBM tumors have unmethylated promoter status for O6-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT); a validated biomarker for TMZ-resistance. Second-line treatment with anti-angiogenic agent bevacizumab has not improved overall survival (OS) and 5-year survival is less than 3%. Dianhydrogalactitol (VAL-083) is a bi-functional alkylating agent targeting N7-Guanine and inducing interstrand cross-links, DNA double-strand breaks and cell-death in GBM cell-lines and GBM cancer stem cells. VAL-083’s cytotoxicity is independent of MGMT status and VAL-083 overcomes TMZ-resistance in vitro. Our recent phase I/II clinical trial in recurrent GBM patients failing both TMZ and bevacizumab, suggested VAL-083 offers clinically meaningful survival benefits for patients with recurrent GBM and pinpointing a new dosing regimen (40 mg/m2/d on days 1,2,3 of a 21-day cycle). A pivotal Phase 3 study in recurrent GBM after failing both TMZ and bevacizumab is being planned. If successful, this study will serve as the basis for a New Drug Application (NDA) submission for VAL-083. In addition, a single-arm Phase 2 study to confirm the tolerability of the new dosing regimen in combination with radiotherapy and to explore the activity of VAL-083 in newly diagnosed MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients whose tumors are known to express high MGMT levels is proceeding. In the present Phase 2 clinical trial, the main goal is to assess the overall survival (OS) in MGMT-unmethylated, recurrent, bevacizumab-naïve GBM. RATIONALE: The vast majority of GBM patients experience recurrent/progressive disease within a year from initial diagnosis and median survival after recurrence is 3-9 months. Chemotherapy regimens for these patients are lacking and there is a significant unmet medical need. Given VAL-083’s novel alkylating mechanism, promising clinical benefit, and favorable safety profile, a trial studying VAL-083 in MGMT-unmethylated recurrent GBM is warranted. METHOD: Open label, single-arm, biomarker-driven Phase 2 clinical trial in MGMT-unmethylated adult GBM patients at first recurrence/progression, prior to bevacizumab. 48 patients will be enrolled to determine if treatment with VAL-083 will improve OS at 9-months compared to historical control with lomustine. The patients will receive VAL-083 40mg/m2/day on days 1,2,3 of a 21-day cycle. Patients will be followed until death or for at least 9 months from enrollment, whichever occurs earlier. Survival will be compared to recently published EORTC26101 for recurrent MGMT-unmethylated GBM patients treated with lomustine. Secondary outcome measures include progression-free survival and overall response rate. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02717962. Citation Format: Barbara J. O'Brien, Jeffrey A. Bacha, Dennis M. Brown, Anne Steino, Richard Schwartz, Sarath Kanekal, Lorena Lopez, Marta Penas-Prado. Phase II study of dianhydrogalactitol in patients with MGMT-unmethylated bevacizumab-naive recurrent glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT054. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT054

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→