MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

The effect of staphylococcal enterotoxin B on antiviral CD8+ T cell responses (VIR6P.1177)

2015· article· en· W2741548702 on OpenAlexaff
Courtney Meilleur, Arash Memarnejadian, S. M. Mansour Haeryfar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfluenza Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperantigenBiologyCytotoxic T cellCD8T cellEpitopeImmunologyImmune systemPopulationVirologyMicrobiologyAntigenMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) is a bacterial superantigen capable of activating a large percentage of the T cell repertoire. Contact with SEB causes T cells to proliferate and secrete inflammatory cytokines, ultimately resulting in deletion or anergy of the activated T cell. This may leave holes in the T cell repertoire, altering the ability of the host to respond to viral infection. We have used a mouse model of influenza (IAV) vaccination and infection to gauge the effect of SEB administration on the quality of the antiviral CD8+ T cell response. Our results show that SEB alters the immunodominance hierarchy of epitope-specific CD8+ T cells during primary, memory and recall responses. We also found that these changes can be explained by the presence or absence of SEB-reactive Vβ regions in the TCRs of epitope-specific CD8+ T cell populations. Intriguingly, SEB exposure also augments the ability of one epitope-specific CD8+ T cell population to kill their target cells. Contrary to previous reports, these results show that contact with SEB may enhance CD8+ T cell responses in the context of IAV infection. In summary, our work uncovers a novel effect of SEB on the immune system, one that has potentially useful implications for the treatment of viral diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Immunology→Same topicInfluenza Virus Research Studies→French-language works237,207→